摘要：Disaster resilience depends not simply on state capacity, civic participation, or technology, but on how these are institutionally combined in disaster governance. Focusing on East Asia, this study compares three recent disasters-the 2021 Henan Floods in China, the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake in Japan, and the 2022 Seoul Floods in Korea-through a qualitative comparative design based on documentary evidence. The analysis shows that resilience was co-produced through distinct institutional arrangements, yielding three protection logics: embedded continuity in Japan, bounded targeting in China, and uneven protection in Korea. AI-enabled disaster preparedness education also emerges as one mode of anticipatory readiness. A supplementary global contextualization places these findings within a broader discursive field, suggesting that the public visibility of AI-EDR varies with wider contextual conditions, while remaining exploratory and non-causal. The study reframes disaster resilience as differentiated, institutionally mediated, and co-produced.

关键词：Disaster governance；Civil society；Co-production；AI-enhanced resilience；Disaster preparedness education

文献来源：PROGRESS IN DISASTER SCIENCE

WOS链接：https://webofscience.clarivate.cn/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:001768345100001